How do I know I can trust the results that K Pro produces?

Trustability is at the heart of K Pro’s design and is ensured in various ways. First, K Pro's reasoning (or thought process) is made accessible to the user. Second, a number of guardrails have been put in place to combat the hallucinations specific to LLMs (see dedicated question), for example by augmenting the literature review with a RAG system to ensure the existence of PubMed IDs returned by K Pro.

More generally, K also relies heavily on tools (modality-specific AI models, etc.) whose proper calling is constantly monitored. Finally, it is important to note that one of K Pro's strengths is that it is based on the analysis of underlying patient data, queried by tools. This data, and therefore the resulting plots, cannot be invented and thus ensure that the response is grounded in reality.